>>17295093Oh so that's why pokemon was in the negative tags! Haha I almost took it out but I assumed it must have been in there for a reason, now I'm glad I didn't otherwise i might have generated a bunch of pokemon pics instead. Anyways I'm glad you liked them
>>17295105That's a good point, it's progressing so fast so there's no rush. I still have a couple pics I generated when dall-e came out last year in the web and they're so terrible now