>>13586774I wonder what gays think of them. I mean they're attracted to men, would they still find someone who tried to look like a woman appealing? And actual straight people wouldn't be fooled, which is why I think that only bisexuals find them attractive.
>nobody said intelligence has to be usedWell intelligent people aren't actually smart when it comes to everything. A maths genius could still have a lot of trouble with driving, for example. And it's quite natural for someone who's knowledgeable about philosophy to come up with all sorts of theories about something like gender. But philosophy is just that.
>scoop all that stuff out like middle aged womenBut some of them still get pregnant. Perhaps they're those who don't have sausages made for them. That still haunts me, by the way...
>dont that apply to all carbs that are flour and eggThat depends on the quantity. But eggs have a lot of protein, they're great for muscle growth.
>you mean the things that are more and more easily automatedI'm a bit torn on that one. Why would you want to get rid of the people who are most likely to fall for your rhetoric during election season? Unless they want to get rid of elections altogether... But still, the intelligent are much more likely to rise up against you.
>she so fat when she went down even a phoenix couldnt lift herDead bodies are supposed to float on water. So she was so fat not even physics worked on her properly...
>cant have you know who associating me with catsI doubt he'd like cat girls, they look much too human. Like so (those are actually horns not ears but I doubt our boy would know the sauce).
>>13586697Also what are your thots on this highly informative picture?
