>>16318116but they cant cause uhhhhhhhhhh
>logically we can't say thati think just looking at nature is a pretty good example
but u can just pull some shit out of your ass like the demons are influencing the animals to do "evil" things lol
maybe thats why pitbulls really like eating babies idk
even trees fight each other dude, for sunlight i think
so are demons making trees wage war on each other
apparently they grow taller and stuff to shade their "competitors" from the sun and harm them
what would be the point in demons doing that when they cant even get any suffering energy or whatever out of trees also
the shit we do is just human nature much like tree nature ig
thinking that we would do only "good" things if left to our own devices without those pesky demons makes for pure cope
i hope religious people dont actually buy into that
>>16318194>because it already takes basically their full poweragain superhero logic lol but okay i guess
but even then it kind of doesnt make sense
because instead of suppressing this higher level of positivity, why wouldnt they rather force down the higher level of negativity?
i think that would be more optimal if ur looking to get the maximum suffering out of the human race
even now the overall amount of suffering in the world easily overshadows the happiness
so if two higher states of negativity and positivity were suddenly introduced then the negative one would be much much more prevalent than the positive, yes?
like i said before also making knowledge of that higher state of positivity is better for them overall because for the people who cant get it, itll be much more suffering knowing that they cant, while also getting pulled down by this other level of negativity
you can keep going ig and say shit like they need to suppress happiness first in order to induce negativity but its more capeshit logic
charlim
