>>10765598>>10765600You said it first -__-
>do you think that pieces which involve nudity can be called artistic?Yeah, but that's not exactly a Monet. While it is well done, the massive milkers distract a bit from what could be rendered more subtly. Sometimes clothed can be better, you know. From the images you've posted, though, I'm sure you do know.
>many of those who want such women (on 4chan at least) are more or less addicted to porn.I don't really get the mindset of people who save a lot of porn, and know the names of pornstars, etc. We all have our own ways of wasting time, but that one seems especially wasteful.
>Some people are in the right place at the right time and they succeed.But if you're simply in the right place, yet don't know how to exploit that, you'll still fail. It takes both. And like you say, sometimes even after someone's exploited the opportunity, they don't know what to with themselves afterwards. It's a tightwalk, that's for sure.
>it also implies that the bill is affordable to the common individual, but that doesn't seem to be the case.On the other hand, are the care and wait times where you're from affected by their being publicly available? Despite it being unfair to not just the poor, but even the middle class, our country can boast some of the best care in the world. People will fly from all over to receive it, nevermind the extra cost, not to mention the developments in medicine that have taken place here. So, while there're certainly many downsides to the way things are, would they really improve or only be degenerated by making it less costly?
>a mature woman who is pretty but inexperienced must be rarer than a unicorn these days.A man can dream, anyway. But I imagine in countries like Japan there're some - Christmas cakes.
