>>23529000because what does 'food is a human right' amount to in practice? when it's not just virtue signalling?
what it means is that productive countries are obligated to feed the unproductive ones
it means that we have to pump Africa with so much food, that their population will DOUBLE every 30 years:
2.5 billion by 2050
5 billion by 2080
10 billion by 2110
20 billion by 2140
40 billion by 2170
80 billion by 2200
Q: who will have to take care of those 2.5 billion people and counting—feed them, clothe them, provide them with medicine, and adequate housing?
A: the same people who fed them in the first place, i.e. us
food as a human right means we have to support a population they ALREADY cannot natively support, as they grow like a tumour to strangle the planet
imagine the suffering and starvation that YOU will cause by supporting these ideas, when there are 10, 20, 40, 80... billion people on a planet which can only support 1 billion
the planet will be a desert of bones and misery
if you think 'food should be a human right', then I would argue you should volunteer yourself as the food, to maintain balance
