>>10774570But I am not looking for porn. See, the porn is only in one's head. If you don't start thinking things then the pictures have no effect.
>we've gotten ourselves out of stickier situationsHave we? But the sun frying us alive would be a first. You sure are optimistic. I can't say I dislike that. I hope you are right. More and more trees are being planted to combat this after all, and more and more regulations are being imposed as well. I only hope that this is indeed a solution and not just temporary damage control.
>well, I'm not complaining exactlyOh my, so you liked them too! Now here's the safest picture I could find, just for you. It shall appease the mods as well, I hope.
>there's so many at this point that I doubt they'd care if they run off a few because lf this, even if they didn't do anything to deserve itWell, that's monopolies for you. One can treat his users like dirt and they won't do anything about it because they can't. Though I'd like to think that if things get really bad in the future then people will do something. I wonder if the original creators of the site could have financed it and kept it alive and running to this day. Maybe selling it off to Google, as unappealing as that sounds, was a necessary evil.
>that's pretty messed upI believe that high profile YouTubers had to talk about it on twitter for YouTube to notice. But them having had no clue (benefit of the doubt) speaks volumes, doesn't it? If some of those were indeed up for years then who knows what else is still out there.
>guess it can make it more relatable to the male readersHow? Well it's only been one instance so far which is obviously not the end of the world. If they keep it so sparse then it's not going to be too distracting. Still, it came quite abruptly after something serious. Maybe my real issue is that there was no real transition here.
