>>19283347I guess at this point I can accept your concession on following grounds:
>Gets a pic of a line of sight that shows an object behind 5000m of alleged curve>Tries to debunk the OPTICAL Line of Sight with a RADIO calculator>The same RADIO calculator is then used to show the proof of RADIO waves travelling beyond the RADIO line of sight.>Somehow that calculation is incorrect he says although the calculator is "perfectly accurate"Implying that:
>RADIO waves and LIGHT waves are the same>But RADIO waves and RADIO waves are NOT the sameIn addition
>few tents of the degreeImplies that only the top of the mountain is visible but much more is visible so you don't just see 1000m behind the curve, you see 4000 mountain + 1000m curve so the light bent 5 kilometers
But of course you'll try to claim that only 2 meters are visible so you'll try to deny the obvious.
Therefore your concession is accepted because you can't back up your claims and you are engaging in a loop of pilpul and blatant mental gymnastics.
Thanx for playing.
