>>16493937>>Muh context>You debunked yourself and your own religion.Anon, I.......... that was literally the point.
Thank you for proving my point for me by getting so ass-blasted at that.
>you are supposed to SHOW and PROVE how this is out of context.thats why I did.
Here is the post (
>>16493924)
and here is the explanation in that post.
No shit some of it has to be interpreted allegorically, some of it is written IN ALLEGORY
The utter fucking state of reddit atheists.
The Bible is written in multiple styles.
Some is written in allegory.
Some is written in direct literally retelling of events by first had witnesses.
Some of it is written in allegorical PROPHESY, see the book of revelations.
>There is 1 book that is literally just legal code.Another which is songs.
Do you seriously believe that if I don't treat song of songs 1:13 as literal, then I can't treat ANY OTHER PART of the Bible literally.
>My beloved is to me a sachet of myrrh resting between my breasts.Do you REALLY believe that, a simple yes or no will do.
And I will only accept a yes or no because judging from how smug you are it should not be a hard question.