>>24630612I suspect that you, as an Austrian, might be a consequentialist, rather than a follower of a duty-based ethical framework, so I believe it to be pointless for me to try to convince you about what is good or not good, since you might believe that means can and do always justify ends, rather than means needing to be inherently good in order for ends to also be justified.
You claim to be in favor of traditional families, but as a consequentialist, you are not in favor of the concept of a family, and by extension of life. Rather, you may be in favor more of very narrowly defined "traditional" families, and only if they happen to all embrace monogamy, heterosexuality, amongst other ideological restrictions, putting you at odds with traditional ways of life in Islamic countries (polygamous) and ancient Greece and pre-modern Japan (bisexual and polygamous). You seem to be fine with inducing suicidal ideation in others if you happen to get rid of "defective" people, something that I under my own moral framework find to be unacceptable, since I do not believe induced suicidal ideation is acceptable. People may commit suicide out of their own free will, especially the ones under circumstances so dire that bringing their own life to an end would bring them relief, as in the case of a person suffering from immense physical pain.
While I do not believe I can convince a person who has a different set of moral axioms that they are wrong, neverthless I do find it justified to say that I find such a mindset and set of actions to be morally reprehensible from my own moral framework, and yet I believe my words may have no effect on you.
