>>3002067>1. She's not shameless in an objective sense because she's clearly ashamed of things she considers sexual, for example when she spots innuendo in her language and gets embarrassed The objective sense doesn't matter since your statements are all about her subjective view. You've handwaved any point I've made by going "muh subjectivity" so you cannot default back to objectivity once I start using your own stick against you, especially since my points were objective.
>>2999666 She was objectively breathing erotically. Kyousuke does not note Kirino as sad when she's actually angry or Manami's Grandpa as breathing when he's playing dead and holding his breath. The line says erotically because that's exactly the way it was. Similarly,
>>3000443 >Draw an illustration of senpai (somehow make him take off his clothes)is what is objectively written by her own hand.
Furthermore, she actively supports the incestuous relationship and even vaguely suggests she would be fine with a threesome of sorts. This in and of itself qualifies for shameless since she shamelessly supports it and the public at large would consider them shameful. Or does that not count because it's the publics' interpretation? Riddle me this, are her lines about masturbation material (or any other Freudian slip) shameful because she inherently thinks of them as such or because the public would view them as such? Does she still think of her lewd thoughts as shameful if she's alone in the comfort of her own home with no one around to hear them? The truth is it doesn't matter.
