>>2993578>The correlation is known to everyone. You're just denying it.That's not a fucking argument. You need to actually post a source that proves it.
>Oh you mean like the ones you posted? I haven't made any claims yet. You're again conflating me with the other guy.
>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=JP&id=evangelion3.htmCongrats, you've cited a source on the amount that 3.33 made in the box office. I don't see how this really proves your point though.
>You're simply invoking a fallacy fallacy here"Fallacy fallacy" does not exist. There is no fallacy in pointing out that you used a logical fallacy because that would imply that you had a proper argument in the first place for me to respond to, when you had a fallacy, hence what I was pointing out. You can play logic games all day but you're not going to prove yourself right anytime.
