Quoted By:
Since the sudden apparition of AI, so advanced and intelligent, taking everybody by surprise, impressed and amazed by all the things AI was capable to do, and the following world-wide massive explosion of popularity and spreading of it, not to mention it kept and keeps getting more and more advanced at a fast rate, it can be used with relative ease and speed. Doesn't take an expert. As a result, just about any idiot with some basic learning before starting, can already make AI generated images/videos/whatever (that range from very poor quality , to just mediocre), and feeling like they are somewhat artists. Sum up to them all the AI enthusiasts which works are generally decent because they think it's an awesome and much more practical way of creating art ("art"), producing high quantities of yet just more and more "slop".
And there you have, the reason. The consequent enormous, invasive flooding of AI-generated anime everywhere now.
Some people argue that AI simply cannot create art and will never do. No matter now or how advanced it will be in the future.
Personally I agree with them. Be it a beautiful landscape or anime image. Created by/with AI. By a skillful individual with very advanced knowledgeable about the tools to generate, editing, and refining exceptionally well. It still just feels like... it lacks something. Like something looks "off".
Lately, I started using a couple of the best free websites that detect with very trustworthy accuracy if an image, just as interesting as the main utility itself (telling you if it's fake or real, AI-generated or Human-made), is it tells you all the reasons of the "Why" of the result the analysis concluded. Characteristics of a fake image and a man-made real image or photo taken by a camera. And expanded information displayed on each.
Here, have a refreshing real pic of Momo in her sexy underwear.
