>>1901207>Hey stupid fuck, everything walking distance is "walkable"Yes! That wasn't up for debate at all.
>And I hate to tell it to you but most the country is full of walkable suburbs and towns where you don't need public transportIf they were built before the 40s, then yes! That's the point, if everything is within a reasonable walking distance, then no transportation vehicle should be needed.
>and the car is the natural benefit for all citizens.Wait, if it's walkable, then why would you need a car? In walkable communities, no vehicles would be needed to access the amenities and locations within the town-- that's why mass transit wouldn't be necessary as you said-- so why the car? This is a complete non-sequitur.