>>1920085We are exploring entirely new power levels here but there is no way to stop.
>For afabs, no. Counterintuitively, cellulite is more aero because the dimples disrupt the boundary layer allowing the airflow to pass easily over the skin.Dimples are OK and you can get that with textured latex, pic. related. It took some time to find safe latex images...
Anyway, won't human hair cause air resistance. It would seem the hair would extend into the airstream.
>The breasts are a different story and should be held in place or preferably removed surgically.Just how many go that far?? Again, latex will push things into place, and reversably so:
>>1919836>For many years the ogive shape was believed to be the most aero leading edge and therefore bare estrogenized breasts with pointy nipples were optimal, but new research has found that surgically removing the breasts is actually the best option for aero due to the real world effects of crosswinds and other off-axis forces.Did people explore the effects of pointedness? I thought the Kobayashi paper took the biscuit but here we have a strong contender.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322530755_Analysis_and_Qualitative_Effects_of_Large_Breasts_on_Aerodynamic_Performance_and_Wake_of_a_Miss_Kobayashi's_Dragon_Maid_Character>Now as to method, keyhole strategy is basically the only way to go here because anyone too obese for keyhole is not going to be very aero in the first place. The double incision is usually only seen in mountain bikers (not real cyclists), where aero is of secondary concern.What is the keyhole strategy? Searches gave no meaningful results.
