>>1350827>20% more people at bestI'm sorry anon but this is utter nonsense. Are you actually familiar with how Metrolink operates?
>double frequencyGenuinely awful idea with absolutely no business thought put into it. Why double the drivers when you can just run the trams themselves as double? Not to mention how you'd have all this extra rolling stock that is completely useless outside of a few peak hours. Even on the most popular stops a single has free seats at off-peak times.
>>1350830I'm
>>1350815 but I just want to touch on what you said to the other guy:
>All the Metrolink stops are equipped for double servicesI think this is true, and I think St Peters Square could probably take more, not that it's much use if people can't get off!
