>>2069552i wont say i dont massively prefer discs for inclement weather but the only reason rims go from "not great" to "actually unusable" is because of nigger manufacturers who make rim side walls completely smooth to appears aero-obsessed fucknuts (who also only ride in fair weather, as they are fuckboys)
when a rim has channels in it to let water be shoved off into them and then sluice off, rim brakes can work at least at all. but every wheel made since 2005 has been fucking enamel-painted all over it
case in point
>>2066379 which literally has rim brakes on a such a wheel that will make them not work at all because the rim tapers in for muh aero, implying he probably doesnt even use the front brakes at all (or even ride at all, given the bizarre brake cable management, unusably small pedals, and that the bike is spotless and shiny despite supposedly having had contact with the outdoors)
>There's zero reason to not have discs let's be real here: maybe the frame isn't drilled for them (mine is not so I only ran rear discs, until swapping the frame and realizing oh shit it doesn't have HOLES and i am out of random mending plates to bodge shit). do not mount disc brakes if it is physically impossible to attach them to your frame, god might get upset at your violation of space-time
