>“It’s just a really bad time to be working here,” one news producer told The Daily Beast in the wake of bombshell legal filings on the network’s inner machinations. https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-journos-sound-off-on-soul-crushing-dominion-legal-filings “I think no regular person could read this and look at Fox like a news organization at this point.”
In the wake of bombshell legal filings showing that Fox News executives and stars seemingly sought to pacify their disgruntled MAGA viewers by airing election lies, while punishing and censoring the employees attempting to deliver the actual truth, the above observation has become commonplace within media circles.
But some of the shots are being fired from within the conservative cable giant.
According to nine Fox News staffers and insiders, the pre-trial filings in Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News further impugn and sully the reputation of the network’s “straight news” journalists, especially since they show Fox was “operating out of fear” over losing viewers to smaller right-wing competitors following its Decision Desk’s early (and accurate) Arizona election night call for President Joe Biden.
“We are not happy,” one reporter told The Daily Beast.
At the same time, five sources familiar with the situation say that despite the very public reputational harm resulting from the Dominion documents, the news side has been kept in the dark on the filings, with no communication from Fox’s corporate management or human resources department.
“It’s just a really bad time to be working here,” one news producer said.
The network, on the other hand, defended its treatment and handling of the news division.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1146950 Why are you still shilling for Fox News?
Anonymous
>>1147508 why are you shilling for daily beast
Anonymous
>>1146790 >the dailybeast >anonymous sources >anonymous sources making quotes that perfectly align with leftist talking points Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1146790 >nine Fox News staffers and insiders Paul Ryan and his crew
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1147543 .....yes and surely murdoch is a leftist spy as well, this sites fight over chromosomes is pathetic & why all the chill oldfags left
Based Incel
>>1147977 derpocraps can't discern fiction from reality
Anonymous
>>1148042 ironic considering the story is about a conservative news outlet making stuff up they didn't believe behind the scenes
Based Incel
>>1148043 >he believes what he reads in the daily beast i rest my case
Anonymous
>>1148045 Funny enough they aren't the only ones reporting the same story, but it must be nice for you to live in a bubble of denial.
Based Incel
>>1148046 the daily kos is not a valid source of news. you're just proving my point.
Anonymous
>>1148047 Retardican wailing
Smartmatic is lining up, Fox lied about them as well so they can smell blood in the water from Dominions suit doing so well
We may get to see the death of Fox 'News' within our lifetime
Based Incel
>>1148051 and when do you expect that will happen? two weeks from now, right after mueller time?
Anonymous
>>1148052 “Liars behave differently, Liars are touchy, sometimes to the point of hysteria. They’re hiding something. That’s the whole point of lying. And they’re worried you’re gonna find out what it is. Liars are fragile because over time, lying makes you weak and afraid.”
Based Incel
Quoted By:
>>1148056 describes the histrionic left to a T
Anonymous
>>1148045 So you're saying everyone is lying but Fox News?
Nice projection.
Anonymous
>>1148426 >so you're saying [poorly constructed strawman argument]? a valiant effort, dum dum
Anonymous
>>1148441 but Fox News just admitted they were lying...
isn't this that old logic puzzle, can you trust an honest liar who says that he's telling the truth, the other guy is lying, while the other guy says the reverse?
You're too stupid to figure this game out by now?
Anonymous
>>1146790 >staffers and insiders >one reporter >five sources >one news producer Okay kid
Anonymous
Is 4chan so overrun with boomers now that there’s this many people who unironically defend and shill Fox News? Lmao holy cope
Anonymous
>>1148443 no one claimed fox news was honest. obviously they're not. but that doesn't give the daily beast free license to make up claims and peddle them under the guise of anonymous sources. this is the exact kind of "journalism" which has resulted in a majority of liberals believing absolute falsehoods such as russiagate and that russia "hacked our election"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What is it about Fox news that makes trannies cry? There's been a literal 3 decade campaign against them that still hasn't worked. It's hilarious.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Only approved state sponsored media is allowed to lie.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1146923 This. You don't get to woe is me working at Fox News in the current fucking year.
Reminder they fucking fired the people involved in calling Arizona for getting it right too fast.
Anonymous
>>1148476 Can you actually show a single article that says Russia hacked our elections?
Cause "our elections are secure" has been a pretty consistent fucking throughline for fucking years.
The accusation was they hacked the fucking Clinton campaign as well as did a ton of other shit like funded propaganda operations in support of Trump and Bernie. And they fucking did. God I bet you're one of those nutters that thinks a Dem staffer did it and Hillary murdered him.
Anonymous
>>1148446 I genuinely wish r/ Donald was still a thing so they would be quarantined there
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1150228 What delusion are you under that they were ever quarantined there?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1150234 >"Hacked our elections" doesn't really mean anything. There's plenty of articles from sources implying Russia is "hacking our elections" If it doesn't mean anything how do you imply it? And if it doesn't mean anything how do you conclusively say Russia didn't do it given all the shit they did?
>First article Describes specific acts and doesn't imply anything.
>Second article Explicitly says election data wasn't compromised
>Third article Local news reporting on a specific local story with specific language about what was done
>4th video I'm not watching that bullshit. Cite the language you're bitching about or fuck off. You've had plenty of chances to make your point and blown them all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1150242 >First article >Describes specific acts and doesn't imply anything Ok cool so first article doesn't imply Russia hacked the election, it specifically says it
Glad we agree anon
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1150242 >Cite the language you're bitching about or fuck off. Also, I posted this
>>1150234 but I'm not the person you were arguing with.
Many major sources did in fact state or imply that Russia hacked our elections in 2016 and continue to do so.
The only thing you for debate is the exact definition of the nebulous term "hacked our elections"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If anyone believes anything that conservative media puts out, they are dupes. Dumb cousin fucking terrorists. Most cons fit at least two of these!
Anonymous
>>1150234 You do realize the Russians did hack into the voter rolls for multiple states, but didn't do anything.
Republicans like you love to push the lie that 'hacked' means 'changed votes'
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1150373 That's what happens when you present the information without context.
The Xe/Xir Who Cried Coup
>>1150373 the claim is that russia hacked our "election", not "voter rolls". and the majority of democrats believe it.
Anonymous
>>1150373 >Republicans like you love to push the lie that 'hacked' means 'changed votes Nobody claimed that.
You're literally the first person in the thread to suggest it means changing votes.
He stated that "hacking the election" is an intentionally nebulous term that was used by left-wing media during 2016, and what you just mentioned is an example of what was presented as hacking our election but was not an instance of changing voter roles
Why can't you read
Anonymous
>>1150380 It was the voter rolls and all the juicy, true dirt from the DNC servers that Russia hacked.
But that's exactly right. The term "hacked our elections!!!!" has been used without context numerous times to intentionally mislead non-politically-inclined people that Russia hacked the 2016 election to change the votes.
Anonymous
>>1148476 >peddle them under the guise of anonymous sources what anonymous sources? most of the recent talk about Fox being a bunch of liars came from sworn depositions. I don't think there has even been an anonymous source involved there.
>russiagate ahh, you're a schizo. I'm sorry, carry on
The Xe/Xir Who Cried Coup
>>1150381 >According to the latest Rasmussen Reports survey, 72% of Democrats said that “Russia succeeded” in changing the outcome of the election that vaulted former President Donald Trump into the White House. >According to a poll conducted by The Economist, 65% of Democrats think "Russia tampered with vote tallies" & 41% believe "millions of illegal votes were cast in the election." These numbers illustrate just how divorced from reality Democratic discourse on Russia has been. kinda crazy when you realize the majority of dem voters are operating from an entirely fabricated worldview
The Xe/Xir Who Cried Coup
>>1150387 >what anonymous sources? see
>>1148444 Anonymous
>>1150388 >Rasmussen I don't think you can pick a shittier, more inaccurate poll
>The Economist And you did, like a bad joke
>>1150390 so you don't actually have sources for 'anonymous sources'
The Fox deposition shows that pretty much everyone at Fox, Murdoch, Hannity, Cucker, they were all aware of the bullshit and deliberately lying.
Anonymous
>>1150381 >The term "hacked our elections!!!!" has been used without context numerous times to intentionally mislead non-politically-inclined people that Russia hacked the 2016 election Well the only people that I know who believed this when the media was reporting it was Democrats the media was reporting it was Democrat voters
The Xe/Xir Who Cried Coup
>>1150392 >attacking the source no surprise that the election denier has an issue with poll results lmao.
>so you don't actually have sources for 'anonymous sources' the article cites unnamed sources. not sure why you're struggling with this.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1150398 >>attacking the source lmao, you're serious. what a faggot
Anonymous
>>1150379 >>1150380 Wrong, it's the Republicans who keep making that claim to distract from the fact that Russia did hack the voter rolls. Now why would they do that?
The Xe/Xir Who Cried Coup
Quoted By:
>>1150405 >the polls are inaccurate because they just are truly impressive reasoning skills. you've convinced us all
>>1150418 didn't realize jen psaki was a republican when she made the exact claim that "russian hacked our election"