>>1900981>2020>Using Rousseau for literally anything but discussing mid-17th century French philosophyFor someone so "well read" (I sincerely doubt you actually read the book, given how nonsensical most if it is with anyone that isn't from Rousseau's period), you seem weirdly adverse to anything that isn't essentially a cynical old man rambling about inequalities and morals, while doing for his entire life direct opposite of his writing.
Why the fuck each and every primitivist is delusional about "muh special past before X", usually going so back down, ending up worshipping Stone Age nomads.
I'm gonna argue you never, not even once, in your entire life were hungry. Not "skip a meal" hungry, but "didn't eat for a week" hungry. And you have no fucking clue what malnourishment even looks like and what it can do to a human. Same with such basic things as warmth or running water. The "evils" of civilised life, the horror!
