>>4245177it reads like "here's some boats and some guys are swimming there too"
Wide, deep, whatever. You know what I mean. Does my critique still stand? Yes.
The next two things you say are just you getting mad. For the first, if you can read in context, I'm saying that they are distracting from the subject (the drummer). For the second, man, there are so many possibilities and I cannot say for certain because I was not at the scene. Nonetheless, you can see that he missed the positioning. I think he should have taken it more front-on; it's a dynamic pose and it loses a lot of its impact when it's from the side. Dude's clearly in a crowd and it's tough to manoeuvre, but... if you miss the shot then don't pick it as one of your better ones.
It's a rhetorical confusion. The subject is the pylon, but I just don't know why it's presented like this... it gets lost in the background because of the b&w. Even then, shat's the point of taking the shot? Proving you can center subjects? I can't guess at the intent here.
What? No man, you move the fucking camera to the left to not put the dude in such an awkward position. Meme diagram related: this is where everything is happening in the image. My brain ignores the foreground and pretty all of the background because they contribute nothing to the photo.
The rusty vehicle is clearly the subject... you can show less sky to balance the subject better in the frame.
Do you want to see my airplane window shot? Next post.
As bad as you say I am at this, man, you're much worse. What I'm saying is that there's little to absorb me into these photos. Pointing out the errors IS the critique; this could be improved, that's alright, think about something else....
Speaking of critiquing the story, you know, if you can't get the basic elements down it doesn't much matter how good your intended story might be, because there are so many distracting things that get in the way. 2/3