>>2857809but that's what I was trying to clarify
my question as simply put is (that you seemed to asnwer): did you take all the photos as a form of documenting what you did for the day?
I'm going to be critical of concert photos because it's what I'm into the most. I'm guilty of my status and mentality because it's something that I care about. I'm shooting a festival I dreamed of shooting this weekend. no matter how far into it I go, it will be a passion for me because I like taking pictures of bands. I want to travel more and document my days but I have two jobs and I'm a full time student, one of those jobs is as a photographer at a VENUE so of course I'm going to focus more on pictures of people in bands
I'm going off on like three tangents at once but my point is I like taking concert photos because I like documenting what happens at a show. I don't think you did a good job doing that with the photos you took. I also understand that there is a doxa of concert photography that everything needs to be perfect and look great and I think that's dumb but whatever
>>2857813buddy, I can send you the RAWs to tweak if you want
and I'm not even sure what your point is with how many people are in my photos. two of them are shows in living rooms, one is at a skate park, and one doesn't even have a crowd lmao. I can't change how many people show up. do you want a smaller crowd? here's a smaller one for you
