>>3573307>Their imaging division is mostly focused on medical equipment.No! The Imaging division is almost entirely their consumer camera, software/firmware, and sensor technology division. All of the medical technology development happens within their respective medical/scientific divisions.
>the photography division is in trouble, not the wider imaging divisionThere is no "wider" Imaging division! Imaging = Cameras and Sensors. Period.
>>3573308Oi, I decimalized the Yen conversion wrong, and was also only looking at revenue (and from a previous year). Pic related shows their revenues as $7.2B and their market cap at twice that. Doesn't change a thing though, it's absolutely fucking RETARDED to think they're going to sell off their Imaging division, which is a prestige part of their business that was literally the foundation of the company 100 years ago and the primary reason Olympus even continued to exist up until the 1990s. Again, COMPLETELY incomparable to Samsung toying with cameras for a few years or Nikon killing a single camera product or whatever.
Just absolute fucking retards trying to argue on this board.
>>3573315>They are examples of companies quietly dropping divisions and product lines without telling stockholders in advance.Not even close to comparable.
>Five years you mutt.OH WOW, A WHOLE 5 YEARS?!
>Another good example.No it's a fucking retarded example, and you're a moron for thinking it's applicable whatsoever, just like dumbass Tony Northcuck.
>Specifically for medical by chance?No dumbass, ALL of their medical equipment is manufactured in Japan. Their new factory in Viet Nam, just like their prior factory in Shenzhen, is SOLELY for consumer cameras, lenses, and accessories.
Shows how much you fucking know about anything.
>>3573326This is what the article is addressing you dumbfucking retard.
>>3573393Go dilate.
