>>4435252thanks (first four are mine)
the digital ones were taken on a 70-200/2.8 I always have with me so I basically had to crop to compose anyways
here's another I forgot about, taken with a longer but optically inferior lens
the film one is uncropped, at 250mm on 6x6 (135mm equiv) and accidentally overexposed by a few stops
>>4435358what stock?
