>>4251050I am getting impressions of you through your responses and your photography and I'm making comments about that. Mostly, I'm saying you don't actually want critique, and I'd even go on to say that you are only pretending to want critique so you can convince yourself that you're really trying to be a good photographer when your photos don't tell the same story. If you want to move back to the photos, well, this is our opportunity to do so. I've been doing that. That's why I offered critique. You can say it's bad, but until you show me and explain why it's bad, I don't have to accept that. This critique of my critique that you are giving me is worse than my critique because you are offering no talking points. To put it clear: avoiding the point, not making an argument, and ending your messages with "lol" are what make you seem angry, and it does tie back to photography. Let's bring it back. Why do you disagree with my critique? Point back to your photos and consider that, yes, you could have made a mistake somewhere and that I could possibly tell you where.