>>3959767>the numbers are not comparable>but the numbers are comparableYou're an idiot.
>The numbers don't lie.If you're going to compare incomparable numbers, the least you can do is have enough knowledge about math to know when A is > than B. Pic related. Once again, the Olympus lens is NEVER as sharp as the Canon is wide open in the extreme corner.
Side note: LP/PH is an attempt to make it possible to compare measurements across sensor sizes and formats. But there are other factors Optical Limits does not account for, hence the warning. So it's not entirely retarded to gauge relative performance by their results. But it is pants on head retarded to insist the lower number is somehow better.
