>>3021783Didn't want to go to a higher ISO, and didn't want to go to a lower aperture. So it was underexposed by a stop, which I knew I could fix in post. Not the most ideal thing relying on PP to fix a photo, but in that scenario it was the best I could do.
>>3022012I appreciate the feedback :) I've got a few more angle from the shot with all the lights, but it was challenging finding a good angle without a bunch of strangers in the background and also with the lights.
>>3021859You think so? The post was very heavy to make up for the fact it's an underexposed shot, but I'm personally pleased with what I was able to do with it. You want the RAW so you can have a go at it?
