>>3463091What kind of lab charges so much for shit scans? Also, have you checked your camera for light leaks, shutter timings and such? It looks like you have a pretty big leak on that photo and it's also underexposed.
If you want better results buy a higher quality film, but even the cheapest ones shouldn't look as bad.
>pic related literally $3 Fuji C200 film that cost an additional $7 to develop and scan