>>4276387One is a parts car and the other is running, but needs a little engine work and a paint job. Moving shit around.
That makes sense about the film. I guess we are both snapshitters with that picture you posted, lol.
I bought a 50 pack like 4 years ago, so I might as well use it. Honestly, I dislike shooting such slow and annoying to develop film.
Atleast it will be interesting to print them using a high end enlarger lenses/contact prints.
The macro shot came out ridiculously sharp, so maybe I'll just use it for that...
>>4276386Epson v800 at 2800dpi. Are you supposed to sharpen them in post or something? I only really ever edit the brightness and contrast sliders...
I will say that for these two car pictures there may be a touch of camera shake. I was using my wooden wista field camera for long exposures. I got a much more rigid 4x5 camera recently, so hopefully that will be a thing of the past.
Youre saying this
>>4276350 is soft?
