>>4416845This photo defintely gives off that "parked" vibe. Unsure if it fits or doesn't fit this, but I would have liked more background blurring honestly, but
>I didn't have an ND filter for this sunny dayexplains it. I fucking hate VNDs. I'm probably screwed using stacked static NDs but we'll see how I got with a couple ND8s and stacking them instead
>>4416847>f/16I see what you mean. That being said, people fag on about diffraction a bit too much on /p/. I think the merits of a lower f/stop here are moot since you'd need something like f/32 to get both cars here in focus, but they're driving opposite ways anyway.
>>4416847This is nice. Simple, clean car with a salient feature and a tasteful amount of motion blur. I'd go with a 3:1 crop here, but that's just preference.
>captcha: g2ayk 