>>3345542>So you're saying you value sharpness over AF and IS?AF wasn't something you had to give up on the native lenses that were discussed prior. You give more AF up with the LA-EA4.
But if you want to go into low budget lenses which: Yes, that's a thing you might sacrifice.
> He also said he was considering a 70-300mm A mount lensAnd it could again be
>>3345188 for the response.
> pretty much all are cheaper than their E mount counterpartsPretty much all that are cheaper are also worse. But yes, you can get cheaper lenses.
I would just neither suggest to do it for your most used lenses (just get some good ones). Nor would I put $300 towards and adapter for cheap lenses, it just deducts from your lens budget that is supposed to be cheap already.
