>>3300634So evidently there's still a fair bit more detail in the Frontier scan, but the difference between the two is maybe not as huge as I'd imagined.
The obvious advantage of the Frontier scanner is that it's a lab-grade scanner and performs as such, in that it's very fast and gets the colour perfect first go (especially for colour neg). The Epson is maybe 70% as good in quality, but is far slower (instantaneous vs. 10-15 minutes per frame), lacks hardware to keep the film flat and the colour science sucks a lot, forcing you to spend more time on images in photoshop/LR
