>>4116765>thread about mirrorless not being smaller and lighter>mirrorless is often half the weight and size spec for spec>THAT'S NOT RELEVANT >:(You make such a fool out of yourself col
>Look at this photo that looks like a fucking watercolor with worse sunstars than a mobile phone, it looks fine to meYet again, proving how little you know colin, such a great look for you
>This quite clearly korean sounding name seems chinese to meThat's because you're a thick, uncultured twat that's never left his hometown, you don't need to keep proving how dumb you are, we get it.
>>4116767>look, he used a camera with a larger sensor!And how much did he crop it down by? You really have the cognitive functioning of puddle slime.
>>4116768>but samyang are more affordable (and better quality) than pentax.Your point? poverty is a mindset, an inability to afford to move with the times.
Pic related, the pentax gets abslutely blasted by the samyang, and the samyang even outperforms the zeiss.
