>>3655704>It's decent, but it is clearly lacking the Zeiss 3D pop™ or the Leica übersharpness ®.Well yeah. It was also something like five hundred bucks brand new with an f/1.1 aperture, so it is what it is.
>Baaaarf. Awful with a rangefinder.Agreed. One of the reasons why I don't use it that often now that I've bought a few other (similarly cheap and Chinese, but without as many little annoyances) lenses.
