>>4337458>The youtubers review cameras in terms of how good they are for vlogging and wedding videos>So when they look at something like af performance, they're not evaluating how good it is at racking focus>They're evaluating how good the camera is at finding a subject and sticking to that subject in a daytime outdoors environment.Bummer.
>The s5ii, in my experience, is a great camera and an unbelievable steal at its price compared to the competition. But the a7siii (which I haven't used for the record) seems to me to be much better designed for actually shooting video.Hmm. So I should snag a used A7s III for somewhat cheap?
>(Having said that, the zv-e1 or whatever it's called is an a7siii but cheaper and with better ai autofocus on the trade off that it's more prone to overheating)Not going to film 10 hours a pop, but an EVF would still be nice to have. I'll take a look at it.
>(And from what other anons have said and what you can see yourself in comparisons, the a7iv (or a7cii) gives sharper video at a cheaper price than the a7siii)For me, low light performance trumps "sharpness" in any comparison as I run around the city at nights and want to capture the moments.
Thanks a lot Anon!
