>>4337395>Nikon ZFI'll take a look, but if I went with Nikon, I'd actually consider the Z6III.
>>4337409>But the a7siii has better af I think.That's why I was asking like a dummy. The newest firmware seems to have put the S5 IIx ahead of the A7s III in all categories according the YouTube, but I want to hear it from more people than influencers who've been sent a camera to by the manufacturer for the sole purpose of reviewing it, even if they say they don't get to keep it or no money changed hands.
>>4337384I'll add another thing to this:
I'm just getting into this hobby so I want to read your opinions (with reasoning if you're willing, I'm always interested on more points of view) on which camera to get if I want / need:
>Full-Frame 4K60 and 1080p120 WITHOUT A CROP>Great Autofocus>GOATed Low light performanceat these price points for the body:
>up to 1000€>up to 2000€>up to 3000€I'm willing to pay more if the camera is actually worth it ("dynamic" budget). Keep in mind, I have 0, in words: ZERO, equip. Means I also need to buy lenses and other stuff as well, but I'd rather buy new lenses than new bodies over time. BUT, 0 gear also means that I have literally 0 brand loyalty and all bets are off.
>Correct me on anything if I'm talking shitCorrect me on anything if I'm talking shit
>Rambling thoughts:I like what Fuji does with the X System, I even considered getting one with wider angle lenses, but after testing the AF in-store with both an X-T5 and an X-H2S, I was left with a very bad taste. Yes, I know, Fuji-X is APS-C, but the concept is still nice.
