>>3143176>A R A K IYea, with fancy lighting even Polaroids look somewhat okay. I'm sure a woman in bondage could also be at least marginally appreciated on Polaroid.
But I bet the guy wouldn't have gotten famous with these (it's more the >300 books and the fancy porn "art" pictures, isn't it?). And it's not even like he is mainly continuing with them.
Honestly, forget Polaroid if you want to be like Araki. Sure, maybe show off your fantastic art skills with a smartphone (typical shit camera of the day that people know and can directly relate to) in order to prove you're a fucking genius or something. It's probably good marketing.
But Polaroid? I can't see why you'd do that. Well, if you want to, good luck. But you're not becoming Araki even if you happen to make equally good Polaroid shots.
