>>4157818>"banding"It's called moire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moir%C3%A9_patternIt's caused because the sensor+lens are so sharp that the camera fully resolves those lines instead of just blurry approximations of them, but the lines sort of line up with the pixels, confusing the demosaicing algorithm and creating that weird rainbow pattern.
The GH6 is too soft to produce moire here, but if it were sharper or the lines were at a different frequency you'd get the same color moire pattern, just like you do on the canon R6, and the nikon Z7, and every other high res camera UNLESS you have x-trans for foveon. Color moire is a design flaw of bayer that can come up on any camera with that painfully outdated CFA design.
>Actually pixel shift gets it-Both of them have pixel shift and it is a useless feature for anything but product shots, test charts, and scanning film. If the wind blows slightly or a cloud moves you'll have artifacts everywhere and spend so much time blending exposures, cloning, and cropping that it would defeat the point
>>4157832Name a lens that can resolve that pixel density. All those MP and for what? You finally caught up to APS-C but only at base ISO. It's still bayer, so if your lens were sharper, you'd run into moire, and if you keep it as is, it's not even as sharp as an APS-C shitter so you have a long ways to go
Panasonic abandoned MFT for a reason. APS-C is and always was the future of hobbyist grade, non-pixel peeping photography which is why fuji is most likely the only camera brand besides canon that will survive the next 20 years. Sony will "survive", but they'll start making phones after pros abandon FF for crop medium format.
