>>4891673The IC should ideally be the belt for guys who aren't quite at the main event, but will elevate them to such heights. Ironically, this was how the belt was back in the olden days before the Money In The Bank briefcase and the big gold post brand split, we may need to unify the WWE and Universal titles in order for this to happen, though.
As for Money in the Bank, I have a few ideas to jot down:
>get rid of the Money in the Bank PPV>bring the match back to Wrestlemania>8 participants - 3 from Raw, 3 from Smackdown, and 2 wildcards>the participants from Raw and Smackdown will be decided via qualifying matches on TV>the wildcards can either be from NXT, someone returning from injury, a returning legend, or a surprise debutDoing this, I think I have an idea on how to make people care about King of the Ring
>like MitB, don't make it a PPV>have matches on TV with the finals taking place on a B PPV before Summerslam>tournament will be split into a Raw block and a Smackdown block with wildcards like I suggested for the MitB thrown in here and there>bring back the stipulation that the winner gets a world title opportunity at Summerslam, either that or they get to choose when and where they can challenge>if the latter, it doesn't work like MitB where they can cash in at a moment's notice, they must announce it beforehandAnd another they can do to keep these fresh is to alternate these between the men and women every year
>one year will be the Men's King of the Ring and the Women's Money in the Bank>next year will be the Men's Money in the Bank and the Queen's Crown (or whatever they called that Women's KotR from the past year)Thoughts?
