>>6505496Not an argument. Vince cannot be forced to step down because he controls over 80% of the voting shares. All the board and Steph can do is try to talk him into stepping down voluntarily, which appears to be what happened.
You have me confused with a Vince mark. I'm merely telling you facts. "Canceling" isn't even the same thing given that implies social ostracization, which clearly isn't happening since a) WWE recognized Vince publicly on Smackdown and gave him a positive sendoff including by the current co-CEO Stephanie, and b) the live crowd chanted "thank you Vince."
You seem to be obsessed with Vince being ruined. He's a 77 year old billionaire who just retired due to a scandal yet had WWE, company executives, former wrestling superstars, and even wrestlers for competing promotions, praising him and thanking him for his time in the industry. Vince himself has been nothing but cordial during this entire process too, which makes your reaction seem especially vindictive and petty.
If you think that's being "cancelled" then there really isn't anything I can say to convince you otherwise because you're clearly deranged and hate Vince for some reason.
