>>10927381>cuz bad art exists they're allowed to do a poor job!What a fucking retard you are.
A company who cares anything about the source tries to do a better job than the source material, if not tries to idealize the most iconic moments.
Any fucking person with a normal IQ knows that they need to put their best foot forward.
Nevermind that handbook art is still thicker, and if you knew anything about anatomy, squating and using them would make them look much bigger than standing in a normal pose that like (not that that that anatomy in the handbook and comics is actually realistic, but these are superhero comics and they'er working within that parameter)
>ib4 but hasbro isn't striving either!They're making kiddy shit and the ML line's style has been generized in a realistic style so that they all fit (mostly) together since the line first started.
>ib4 but maybe Mafex didn't want to base the toy on his most iconic comics by rick leonardi!lol, another failure then.
Not sure if i said it in another thread, but i hope the images they're posting are just poor scans and ai upscaled, because why the fuck didn't they even use fucking shading? Their first Spiderman did an OK job at the shading, at least in the reissues.