>>11407472sorry to be the conspiracy-theory-guy
I just think it's kinda funny how this very subtle sort of rumor can ruin a company
how many people read that simple sentence and think: "hmm, I was going to give this Lego competitor a chance, but I heard it was poor quality, so I passed..."
there's a chance you're being honest or there's a chance you got paid by Lego to post that simple propaganda.
does Lego care enough about lame message board to spread rumors about the competitors being lower quality? is Lego smart enough to use such (evil?) tactics? probably not (but that's what they want you to think! mwa-ha-ha!)
I'm not saying you're being dishonest, I'm just pointing out the power you wield
(we all know Lego brick quality has gone downhill, actual LEGO bricks crack and break all the time, now, too)