>>26450110I AM a competitivefag and I still don't ger why the fuck should we have less pokemon
You are incredibly retarded. What do you even want to accomplish by removing pokemon?
If right now there are, let's say (as an example, you autist), 50 viable pokemon and 950 not viable.
Why on earth would you want to remove the 950 not viable ones? What would that even do? In the end there will be the same amount of viable mons, and you are literally just removing options from the game because you are a fucking autist.