>>45047732>>45048134quick amendment, by "this point" Is specifically meant the matter of Luvdisc guy's claim of it being deleted being valid.
>You are fucking out of your mind if you think Pokemon is anything resembling big budgetNever said they did, also never implied it. That BFV example was me showing that profit ultimately matters more than big numbers, nothing more. That's why I find you bringing up how much the games sell outside of a raw "popularity" sense weird. The games are popular as fuck, do not get me wrong, but I doubt they'd be outselling the merch it's up against.
> shills and bean counters assert that the video games don't make enough money to justify additional investment. That's bullshit, and I'd hope you can at least admit that's complete bullshit. I don't even want AAA open world memes like some other anons, all I want is for these games to have the content that's been standard for years and a little spec of polish. I would be perfectly fine with something that looked like X and Y in HD if they did that.Of course. Let me remind you that Pokemon has no excuse for its shitty quality aside from greed, laziness, or stubbornness. The games should be in a much better spot than they are now, but for whatever fucking reason, they aren't. No defending that from me.
