>>57401776>Probably not. I renamed a pic that I took from pixiv, and I couldn't find the source for another anon as a result, which I deeply regret.Ah, I think I get where you're hung up. I mean edit the names to their sources, a la
>>57401440 &
>>57401441 from their twitter filenames (theyre like, timestamps originally, which is so weird imo, just do @username-unixtimestamp) to ones with the artist's name.
I leave Pixiv ones alone because, like pic rel, they have the post IDs already added to em.
I think I changed one pixiv, once, and yeah you can't find that shit again if it's rule34 (like
an amarys pic i have https://files.catbox.moe/q70i0w.png which might be from pixiv i dunno)
