>>47429042>Make a joke about Pokemon mandates being retarded since anons were bringing them up as part of their reasoning>"Actually they make sense because [headcanon about devs]">Point out how that interpretation only works if you assume a questionable source as absolute truth, then further point out how taking everything devs say as absolute truth is dumb by listing multiple examples of major dev not knowing what the fuck he's talking about>"How DARE you imply Pokeballs aren't super comfortable!">Again point out that I never said nor implied that, I specifically used the capture process as an example of actual canon conflicting with the word of god>"W-well, you're just ranting and offtopic anyways!"If one line about Pokeballs is offtopic and we're talking about sex with Pokemon ONLY (despite multiple points where the conversation also addresses Pokemon sapience, Pokemon personhood, Pokemon in relation to animals; stuff that would support or deny it being okay to fuck Pokemon morally... which relying on Masuda's statements and mandates count as), then why the fuck did you feel the need to respond to a seven hour old "offtopic rant" with the intent to prove it wrong?
