>>49418320The RSE sprites as well as first official portrait all looked incredibly effeminate, but yeah, you can scour the Pokéverse until you find a somewhat less-feminine one. Not that the one you posted looks anything but effeminate, though.
>>49418557Oh, well, I don't have an issue with it at all. I was just saying that the designers had every intention of making it an effeminate Pokémon and it is entirely designed as such. There really isn't any room for debate except for the name "Sir Knight." As if an arbitrary name changes the physical design of the Pokémon, its movements, mannerisms, and voice.
