>>56217149>dodgingAgain, not my job to summarize the thread for you.
> I didI just read it, you didn't answer the question. Here, I'll post the question again in case you forgot to answer it directly: how is attempting to respond last seconds before a thread dies realistically expecting other to respond? The intent is actually the opposite. At that point it's (You) who is desperately trying to start a flamewar by reviving the thread in the nick of time.
In other words, EVERYONE who posts made posts that are able to be responded to. That's not what we are discussing.
>YouNope
>By responding you are opening yourself up to being responded to.If his post is responsible for all its replies, than the post he responded to while saging is responsible for his saged post. You can't have it both ways. If he wanted responses, he'd bump. Tell me why he saged then. You're unable to.
>still pretendingEvery post with "sagefag" or "sagie" is accusing someoneof saging posts.
