>waits until page 5 when posts start getting deleted again to respondI'm starting to think sagefag himself is a janny who's trying to cover his ass.
>>56013092>And the same scale could just exist in reference to "the same game except hypothetically fixing the particular flaw I'm talking about",Then you're still making comparisons, then you're still genwarring, according to your dumbfuck logic. The post never said the "good games" have to exist.
>The route discussion is talking SPECIFICALLY about routesWhich regions are made up of. Which games are made up of. Which means it's genwars and gamewars according to your shitty logic, as you explained here
>>56012299>with no substance to the post except starting shitAnd now you're changing the argument to "substance" because you realized you wrote yourself into a corner like an absolute retard. How the fuck is posting a route and then saying "presented without comment" substance, except to start shit, sagefag? Go on, tell the class.
>Multiple conditions must be true for something to be considered a genwarThe only condition you're consistent with is "you criticized a game I don't like"
