>>31788335So your argument is that it is ok to REMOVE HALF OF THE MEGAS because Blaziken was a day 1 event?
This is false equivalency:
-Blazikenite was avaliable for anyone since day 1, be it trading or mystery gift, unlike all the currently unavaliable megas
-we never lost anything as Blazikenite didn't exist in gen 5
>>31788369>most of the meta is based on them>gimmickviper.jpg