>>35109953>She knows riddler and translates for him if she posts a leak it could be originally from riddler.You need to use some critical thinking here because you're jumping to all kinds of conclusions without even noticing it.
>She knows riddlerCorrection: She TRANSLATES Riddler. To be more specific, she TRANSLATES somebody on a Chinese forum who leaked S/M information with accuracy. That doesn't mean she 'knows' the Riddler, it doesn't mean that everything she posts will be from the Riddler and it doesn't mean that the Riddler is necessarily accurate now.
>She's never posted a wrong leakCorrection: She has posted a number of leaks, both incorrect and correct (Check her YouTube channel). But she makes a particular point of leaks from the forum she translates as so far, one poster on the forum has turned out to be correct.
There's nothing wrong with what she's doing here, but it doesn't mean that it will always be correct. Look at what she's posting about now - the 'Japanese Riddler'. There is no Japanese Riddler; just someone posting riddles in Japanese on the same forum as the Chinese riddler. Nothing this 'Japanese Riddler' has proven to be true; nothing anyone says on that forum has proven to be true aside from the Chinese riddler. They don't gain credibility just from posting in the same forum as him. Lots of people have leaked things about videogames, music, politics, movies etc. on 4chan; that doesn't mean an outsider should believe everything we say.
If you're going to make factual-sounding statements, you need to actually fact check them - not stop at the first source and assume it to be true.
