>>68638877>>68633693This is working really well! I just substituted the segs detailer I used before, and it is soo much more consistent. Thank you anon for letting me know about those nodes!
One thing I noticed, that is most likely because it is denoising 100%, and thus has more detail to work with, is that it tends to do large characters, while the segs detailer I had used before on around .7-.8 denoise also had characters much further away by default. However, that's a fine trade off, as at least now there's actually a character in each image.
https://files.catbox.moe/caf09w.png (picrel original)
https://files.catbox.moe/duocxx.png (Mococo)
https://files.catbox.moe/o3h53b.png (Coco)
https://files.catbox.moe/12vcwl.png (Fauna)
https://files.catbox.moe/b5p6b2.png (Mio)
https://files.catbox.moe/4l1wq2.png (Pekora)
https://files.catbox.moe/22hfqg.png (Suisei)
Bonus:
https://files.catbox.moe/slbzzu.png (Frizzy Hair Ollie, where the upscale absorbed a tree into her hair)
Added to the album:
https://catbox.moe/c/mu3sge>>68640792Amazing image.
Also, thanks for the workflow. I think I mostly get what you're doing. The only question I have is regarding the pre and post processor? I assume these are diverging workflows, so, you don't need them if you want to get to the masked_img2img, but instead just use them seperately and ignore the rest. Interesting idea, I have these kinds of things in completely different files, though I also rarely use them. For the most part I've been just endlessly genning through one workflow, sometimes inpainting specific images.
Also, I see you use the Segsdetailer afterwards. I am kind of scared of doing that, as I am just barely below my VRAM limit at some points(it reaches slightly above 100% sometimes. Occasionally it also completely crashed my system when I was still on Ubuntu)
Also also, kind of funny how my interests/hobbies and what I learned in uni have more crossover than my work does. Just seeing Navier-Stokes makes me a bit nostalgic, even though I barely remembered what it was before looking it up again.
>>68645447That's really cool. And the parts where it's mixed with real life are pretty impressive. Definitely Roger Rabbit vibes.
>>68646901I have posted tonnes of onsen pics, and I think one even had a slightly see through towel. I think if there isn't anything explicit in frame it's probably fine. So no nipples, dicks, etc. As
>>68647276 said, Cameltoe is kind of iffy. I've seen most get away with a lot, but I can't say where exactly the limit is.
